From 68cf740954a16c5b8a8cec2006c753ad3fb5006d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: =?UTF-8?q?Jan=20M=C3=B6bius?= Date: Thu, 15 Aug 2013 08:42:10 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] Removed debug output git-svn-id: http://www.openmesh.org/svnrepo/OpenMesh/trunk@930 fdac6126-5c0c-442c-9429-916003d36597 --- src/Unittests/unittests_mesh_dual.hh | 9 +++------ 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/Unittests/unittests_mesh_dual.hh b/src/Unittests/unittests_mesh_dual.hh index 8a218575..604609c4 100644 --- a/src/Unittests/unittests_mesh_dual.hh +++ b/src/Unittests/unittests_mesh_dual.hh @@ -43,12 +43,9 @@ TEST_F(OpenMeshMeshDual, Dualize) { dualMesh = OpenMesh::Util::MeshDual(mesh_); - - std::cerr << "Original has " << mesh_.n_vertices() << " , " << mesh_.n_edges() << " , " << mesh_.n_faces() << std::endl; - - EXPECT_EQ(15048u, dualMesh->n_vertices()) << "The number of vertices after decimation is not correct!"; - EXPECT_EQ(22572u, dualMesh->n_edges()) << "The number of edges after decimation is not correct!"; - EXPECT_EQ(7526u, dualMesh->n_faces()) << "The number of faces after decimation is not correct!"; + EXPECT_EQ(15048u, dualMesh->n_vertices()) << "The number of vertices after dual computation is not correct!"; + EXPECT_EQ(22572u, dualMesh->n_edges()) << "The number of edges after dual computation is not correct!"; + EXPECT_EQ(7526u, dualMesh->n_faces()) << "The number of faces after dual computation is not correct!"; delete(dualMesh); }